After reading and discussing
Nathaniel Hawthorne’s short story, The
Birthmark, I found a hidden nugget of truth, or life lesson in the irony of
the story. In the story, a rational, ambitious, yet hubristic scientist tries
to scientifically remove a small, crimson, handprint looking birthmark from his
already drop dead gorgeous wife’s cheek. The ironic part is, when he finally
accomplishes his goal of removing the birthmark his wife dies. It’s sad to
think about, but the thing [his wife] he was working so hard to change, ended
up being the victim of his own self-interest. The hidden nugget of truth I
found from this story was to step back, let go of all self-preconceived notions, and truly
understand, as well a accept people for who they really are.
I feel like too
many people these days are trying to mold their significant others, friends,
and family into something that they are not, which in the end causes more damage
than good. I’ve personally been the offender and the victim of this, and
usually the root of the problem comes from not being able to step back from my
own self-interests and try to understand things from other peoples’
perspectives. I’ll also admit that I have thought that I am always right at
times, and fail to try to actually listen to what other people are trying to
tell me, but I also feel like that’s not just me. It’s almost a problem of pure
self-misinterpretation, in the sense that we are so caught up in our own
assumptions of things that we fail to stop and listen to the interpretations of
those around us. I believe that in society, it is the idea of class roles that
are setting people up to follow in the same footsteps as this scientist.
And yes, there are
certain situations in which people actually do have to make changes in others,
for example in sports or other professions where there are certain standards or
guidelines, such as correcting one’s basketball stroke or baseball swing.
Nonetheless, when a person of lower occupational status, such as a janitor,
tries to tell a man of higher occupation, such as a lawyer or chairman of a
corporation, that he is doing something wrong, or he should do x instead, the
person of higher occupation will almost never heed to the lower’s advice. This
idea of ignorant social class superiority even comes up in the short story
itself.
From the
scientist’s point of view, his wife is close to perfection, yet the one thing
preventing her from being “perfect” is her birthmark. This birthmark is
something that the scientist cannot bear to live with and must get rid of it. However,
from the viewpoint of his lab servant (and probably any other guy that is attracted
to women), the birthmark is seen as a magical mark of beauty, or in other
words, something that only adds to her rare beauty. The servant even says, “If
she were my wife, I’d never part with that birthmark” (Hawthorne 89). Later
when the wife passes away after the removal, the servant gave a, “…gross,
hoarse chuckle” (Hawthorne 98), almost indicating that he already knew that the
scientist’s wife was going to die from the experiment.
This is where the
irony of the story comes back into play. The scientist, or the person of higher
social status, who is rational and very well educated, lacked the foresight
that his servant (not as educated, lower social class) had the entire time.
This just goes to show that one must not ignore others’ ideas and advice just
because of one’s selfish preconceived social assumptions. One must take a step back
and see everyone as equals and respectfully accept everyone’s ideas or advice
as equal, and not just toss it aside like the scientist in this story regretfully did.
Taku, this post hits home in many ways. I completely agree with you due to the fact that I am guilty of being stubborn and seeing things in my own light. I think that the irony of the Birthmark represents a sort of Karma (If you believe in Karma). The quote that contained the most truth was when you stated "I feel like too many people these days are trying to mold their significant others, friends, and family into something that they are not, which in the end causes more damage than good." This quote speaks a thousand words. Everyone who reads it can immediately relate to it whether they admit it or not.
ReplyDeleteI would also like to add the quote "ignorance is bliss." I think this common saying sums up everything you have said, especially relating back to the story. The scientist refuses to see past her on imperfection and ultimately causes her to die. I truly believe that if everyone took a step back from the situation they were in, the world would be a different place.
As a side note, do you think that jealousy also played a role in this story? Was the scientist jealous of the attention his wife was achieving?
You made a great point when you talked about how people try to mold the most important friends and family around them into something they aren't. Everyone has their ideal way of who and what they want to be surrounded with. Each person wants complete control of his or her surroundings causing most people to become blind of what they actually have in front of them. Taku, your comment, “…step back, let go of all self-preconceived notions, and truly understand, as well as accept people for who they really are.” shows the rational side of looking past the total control every person desires. I think that moment you step back and look past having total control is when true happiness, the happiness Aylmer never obtained, will present itself to you.
ReplyDeleteThe connections of Aylmer’s obsession for complete control and his assistant’s acceptance and admiration for the birthmark is a great example of your point in this blog post. Both show the good and bad associate with the notion of total control, bringing closure into the post.